Autonomous by design. Accountable by default.
Safe but useless for real work. They can summarize text and answer questions, but they can't deploy code, manage infrastructure, or operate autonomously. You babysit them through every step.
Powerful but terrifying. Give an agent access to your codebase and it might deploy broken code to production. Give it API keys and it might burn through your budget in minutes. Run multiple agents and they'll overwrite each other's work.
The industry is building faster agents. Almost nobody is building governed agents.
| Trust Level | What They Can Do | Human Oversight |
|---|---|---|
| L1 | Read repos, run safe tools, basic research | Approval required for everything |
| L2 | Write files, delegate to sub-agents, web access | Approval for destructive ops only |
| L3 | Deploy to staging, manage teams, schedule tasks | Notification on major actions |
| L4 | Production deploys, system configuration, full autonomy | Fully autonomous |
Trust isn't configured — it's earned. Agents start restricted and gain autonomy through demonstrated reliability. The runtime enforces these levels. An L1 agent literally cannot call L3 tools. This isn't policy. It's architecture.
Most frameworks hardcode workflows as directed graphs. Agency lets agents earn autonomy through demonstrated reliability. Trust levels adapt based on performance — success rate, cost efficiency, safety record — calculated over a rolling window.
Agents coordinate directly, not just top-down. One agent asks another for research mid-task. Emergent collaboration, not scripted pipelines. Messages are persistent, audited, and trust-gated.
Hard caps per agent, per run, per day. Hierarchical — children can't exceed parents. When a budget is hit, the run stops. Not a billing alert you notice tomorrow. A kill switch in the runtime.
New agents need approval for everything. As they prove themselves, approval gates fade. Trusted agents operate autonomously. You define the guardrails — then get out of the way.
Agents learn from mistakes, remember what worked, build institutional knowledge across sessions. They propose improvements to their own behavior. Every change requires human approval. Better over time, never unsupervised.
A persistent service running scheduled tasks, monitoring agent health, and managing work even when you're away. Agents wake up on schedule, process queued work, and report results asynchronously.
Watch Agency orchestrate a real multi-agent sprint — from natural language to shipped feature.
DAGs are great for deterministic workflows. But real agent work isn't deterministic. An agent discovers a dependency mid-task, asks a peer for help, adjusts scope based on findings. Static graphs can't model that.
Because alerts are reactive. By the time you see the notification, $200 is already gone. Agency enforces budgets at the runtime level — the agent run terminates the moment a cap is hit. No exceptions, no overruns.
Static approval workflows become bottlenecks. If every action needs sign-off, you're just a slower version of doing it yourself. Agency's approval gates fade as agents demonstrate reliability. The system scales down your involvement automatically.
Because context is expensive. Every time an agent starts fresh, it re-learns your codebase, your preferences, your conventions. Agency agents persist memory across sessions. They build institutional knowledge. They get better at your work over time.
Dispatch a feature to three agents. They work in parallel on isolated branches — one on the API, one on the UI, one on tests. Each agent operates within its trust level, stays within budget, and checkpoints its work automatically.
When they finish, you review the diffs. Approve, merge, ship.
Manual task splitting, sequential AI pair programming, copy-pasting between chat windows, hoping nobody's changes break anybody else's work.
A three-agent sprint that runs while you're in a meeting. You come back to three PRs ready for review, not three chat windows waiting for input.
Your own AI staff, running on your own infrastructure. Agents that know your preferences and get better over time.
Six different AI subscriptions that don't talk to each other and forget everything between sessions.
A persistent AI team that knows your preferences, operates within your rules, and gets better over time.
The core is live — orchestrating real agent swarms, shipping real code, enforcing real budgets.
It's whether they'll do it safely.
Request Early Access →